The basic lifecycle
The coworker scopes it
If the request is ambiguous, they’ll ask a clarifying question rather than guess and deliver the wrong thing. A vague request like “look into our competitors” might come back with “which three matter most to you right now?” rather than a generic report nobody asked for.
They do the work independently
You don’t need to keep the conversation open or check in. Depending on the task, this can take anywhere from a minute to well over an hour — a quick fact-check versus a full competitive teardown feeding several specialist agents.
One coworker, or several
Some tasks are naturally one coworker’s job. Others need more than one — a client-ready dashboard needs Hannah’s research first, then Alex to turn it into something visual. There are three ways this actually happens:You loop them in yourself
You loop them in yourself
Send Hannah’s findings to Alex directly, the way you’d forward an email to a colleague. This is the simplest path and works for any two-step handoff — no special syntax, just forward the reply.
Elena coordinates it for you
Elena coordinates it for you
Tell Elena you need a multi-part project done — she routes each piece to the right specialist (research to Hannah, visualization to Alex) rather than trying to do everything herself, and keeps track of what’s still open. This is the right move once a project has more than 2-3 moving parts, or when you want one person to own the status.
A coworker draws on its own specialist capabilities
A coworker draws on its own specialist capabilities
Hannah has her own research capabilities for heavier data pulls — direct access to sources like Statista and GWI Spark — without you needing to manage anything. It’s invisible to you, she just delivers a better answer because of it.